It seems like Apple and Samsung are gearing up for another round in their long-standing patent dispute, adding yet another chapter to their contentious history. The two tech behemoths are set to face off once again in a district court to address issues of design patent infringement. Judge Lucy Koh has mandated a courtroom showdown to determine the extent of Samsung’s liability for infringing three patents. This legal development stems from a significant Supreme Court ruling that altered the traditional approach to assessing damages for design patent violations.
The court’s decision highlights the evolving landscape of patent law and the nuanced considerations involved in such cases. Judge Koh’s order, acknowledging the need for clarity in determining damages, marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing legal saga between the two industry giants.
You are watching: Apple and Samsung head for yet another patent damages trial
See more : Apple Watch shoppers, prepare to preorder online (and wait)
Both Samsung and Apple are poised for this fresh legal showdown, each viewing it as an opportunity to shape the future landscape of design patent litigation. With the stage set for a recalibration of legal standards, the tech world awaits the outcome of this latest legal tussle.
**FAQs**
1. What is the latest update on the ongoing Apple versus Samsung legal battle?
The two tech giants are heading back to district court to determine the amount Samsung owes Apple for infringing three design patents.
2. What prompted this retrial between Apple and Samsung?
A Supreme Court ruling stated that damages for design patent infringement should be based only on the specific part of the device that infringes the patents, not the entire product.
3. How has this ruling affected the value of designs and patent infringement cases?
The ruling reshapes how the value of designs is determined and the amount companies may have to pay for copying a competitor’s product.
4. What did Judge Lucy Koh’s order specify regarding the retrial?
Judge Koh noted that the jury instructions during the previous trial did not accurately reflect the law and prejudiced Samsung, leading to a retrial.
5. How have Apple and Samsung reacted to the upcoming retrial?
Samsung welcomed the retrial as an opportunity to implement the US Supreme Court’s guidance on design patent damages, while Apple did not provide a comment.
6. How long have Apple and Samsung been engaged in legal battles over patents?
The companies have been fighting over patents since 2012, with the recent focus on design patent infringement.
7. What was the Supreme Court’s opinion on the scope of the infringing “article of manufacture”?
The Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion defining how damages for design patent infringement should be decided, leading to the retrial.
8. What did the appeals court ruling in February mandate regarding the Apple versus Samsung case?
The appeals court sent the case back to district court to determine how damages should be decided based on the defined “article of manufacture.”
9. What factors did Judge Koh specify for determining the “article of manufacture”?
Judge Koh outlined four factors to define the relevant item that has been infringed in the ongoing legal battle.
10. What is the upcoming schedule for the Apple versus Samsung case?
A case management meeting is set for October 25, requiring both parties to file plans advancing the case schedule and trial date.
11. How does the burden of proof in identifying the relevant article of manufacture lie in the case?
Judge Koh stated that the plaintiff bears the burden of persuasion in identifying the infringed item and proving the amount of profit from its sale.
12. What updates can we expect in the near future regarding the Apple versus Samsung legal battle?
Both Apple and Samsung are expected to file plans advancing the case schedule and trial date by the upcoming case management meeting on October 25.
Summary
The Apple versus Samsung legal battle is heading back to district court for a retrial to determine the amount of damages owed for design patent infringement. The ongoing dispute, which began in 2012, has seen significant developments following a Supreme Court ruling on the scope of the infringing “article of manufacture.” This ruling has reshaped how the value of designs is assessed and how much companies may have to pay for copying a competitor’s product. Judge Lucy Koh’s order outlines key factors for defining the infringed item, shifting the focus to specific parts of the device rather than the entire product. Both Apple and Samsung are gearing up for the retrial, with a case management meeting scheduled for October 25 to advance the case schedule and trial date. This legal saga highlights the complexities of design patent infringement and the evolving landscape of intellectual property law. Stay tuned for further updates on this high-profile case.
Source: https://anytimesoftcare.com
Category: Internet