In the final days of his presidency, Donald Trump targeted another Chinese tech giant. The Trump administration recently added Xiaomi, among eight other companies, to its list of “Communist Chinese military companies.” This designation prohibits these firms from receiving investments from US citizens or organizations. If upheld, current investors in the US would have to divest from Xiaomi.

Xiaomi, known as one of the top phone manufacturers globally, holds a significant market share, following Samsung and Huawei. Their popularity spans across China, Latin America, and Europe, where they sell more phones than even Apple. Despite the allegations, Xiaomi stated that they comply with all US laws and regulations and are not affiliated with the People’s Liberation Army.

The difference in the treatment of Xiaomi compared to Huawei, another Chinese tech giant, lies in the nature of their businesses. Huawei, primarily involved in telecommunications equipment, was deemed a national security risk due to its ties to the Chinese military. This distinction led to Huawei being placed on the more severe “Entity List,” restricting trade with US companies. In contrast, Xiaomi’s focus on consumer electronics resulted in its addition to a less restrictive blacklist.

The Department of Defense’s efforts to identify companies associated with the People’s Liberation Army date back to 1999. Trump’s administration emphasized the intertwining of China’s private economy with its military and security apparatuses through the Military-Civil Fusion strategy.

Trump’s stance against Chinese companies, such as Huawei, ZTE, and now Xiaomi, has been a recurring theme during his presidency. Apart from these tech giants, Trump also targeted Chinese-owned apps like TikTok, along with prohibiting transactions with several others.


  1. What does it mean for Xiaomi to be designated a “Communist Chinese military company”?
    Being labeled as such restricts Xiaomi from receiving investments from US entities and requires existing US investors to divest from the company.

  2. How does Xiaomi’s market share compare to other phone manufacturers?
    Xiaomi is among the top phone makers globally, trailing behind Samsung and Huawei in terms of sales volume.

  3. Why was Huawei placed on the “Entity List” while Xiaomi received a different designation?
    Huawei’s involvement in telecommunications equipment, considered a national security risk, led to its stricter designation compared to Xiaomi’s focus on consumer electronics.

  4. How has Xiaomi responded to the allegations of being associated with the People’s Liberation Army?
    Xiaomi has denied any affiliation with the Chinese military, emphasizing compliance with US laws and regulations.

  5. When did the Department of Defense start identifying companies linked to the People’s Liberation Army?
    The Department of Defense began compiling a list of such companies in 1999.

  6. What is the significance of the Military-Civil Fusion strategy mentioned in relation to Chinese companies?
    The strategy emphasizes the cooperation between civilian Chinese companies and the military to strengthen the country’s military-industrial complex.

  7. What repercussions did the Entity List have on Huawei’s operations?
    Being on the Entity List restricted Huawei from trading with US companies, leading to limitations such as the absence of Google’s Play Store on their devices.

  8. How does Xiaomi’s situation differ from that of Huawei regarding US trade restrictions?
    Xiaomi’s focus on consumer electronics resulted in a less severe designation compared to Huawei’s involvement in telecommunications equipment.

  9. What was the aim of Trump’s executive order targeting Chinese companies?
    The executive order aimed to restrict transactions with Chinese companies like Huawei, ZTE, and applications such as TikTok and WeChat Pay.

  10. How has Trump’s reproach of Chinese companies impacted US-China relations during his presidency?
    Trump’s actions against Chinese companies have been a significant aspect of his presidency, influencing trade relations between the US and China.

  11. How has Xiaomi’s market presence evolved over the years?
    Xiaomi has expanded its market reach to various regions globally, becoming a notable player in the smartphone industry.

  12. What steps can US investors in Xiaomi take following the designation of the company as a “Communist Chinese military company”?
    US investors are required to divest from Xiaomi due to the restrictions imposed on investments from American entities.


In conclusion, the recent designation of Xiaomi as a “Communist Chinese military company” by the Trump administration has placed restrictions on the company’s ability to receive investments from US entities. Despite being a prominent player in the global smartphone market, Xiaomi faces challenges following this designation, highlighting the complexities of US-China relations in the tech industry. Moving forward, it is essential for readers to stay informed about the evolving landscape of international trade regulations and their impact on companies like Xiaomi. To learn more about this issue and its implications, visit our website for further insights and analysis.