Apple and Samsung: A Battle of Patents Rekindled

Maybe you are interested

In a high-stakes legal battle that has the potential to reshape the mobile device industry, Samsung and Apple have returned to court to face off over patent infringement claims. Samsung has made a surprising move by dropping claims against Apple’s iPad and reducing the amount of damages it seeks, a sign that the stakes are escalating and the outcome remains uncertain.

You are watching: Samsung drops iPad infringement claims, asks for less money

AnyTimeSoftcare.com, your trusted source for tech news and insights, provides an exclusive take on this captivating case, offering the latest updates and analysis. Join us as we delve into the intricacies of the legal dispute and explore its implications for the future of mobile technology.## Apple v. Samsung 2014: The Gadgets in Question

Expert Witnesses for Apple

Apple’s case relied heavily on expert witnesses to establish the validity and infringement of its patents.

  • John Hauser, Professor of Marketing at MIT Sloan School of Management: Hauser conducted a conjoint study to demonstrate that Apple’s patented features increased the appeal of Samsung’s devices.

  • Christopher Vellturo, Economist and Principal at Quantitative Economic Solutions: Vellturo calculated Apple’s damages due to Samsung’s infringement, resulting in a figure of $2.191 billion.

Expert Witnesses for Samsung

Samsung presented a team of experts to challenge the validity of Apple’s patents and argue against infringement.

  • Martin Rinard, Professor of Computer Science at MIT: Rinard provided testimony contesting the novelty and obviousness of Apple’s slide-to-unlock patent.

  • Saul Greenberg, Professor of Human-Computer Interaction at the University of Calgary: Greenberg testified that Apple’s universal search feature was not sufficiently distinctive to be patentable.

  • Kevin Jeffay, Professor of Computer Science at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill: Jeffay challenged the validity of Apple’s background syncing patent, arguing that similar functionality existed in prior art.

  • Daniel Wigdor, Professor of Computer Science at the University of Toronto: Wigdor questioned the uniqueness of Apple’s automatic word correction feature, claiming it had been implemented in previous software.

Contested Patents

See more : Broadcasters challenge FCC 'white space' report

Apple’s Patents:

  • 5,946,647: Quick links
  • 6,847,959: Universal search
  • 7,761,414: Background syncing
  • 8,046,721: Slide-to-unlock
  • 8,074,172: Automatic word correction

Samsung’s Patents:

  • 6,226,449: Camera and folder organization functionality
  • 5,579,239: Video transmission functionality

Accused Samsung Devices

Apple alleged that the following Samsung devices infringed its patents:

  • Admire
  • Galaxy Nexus
  • Galaxy Note
  • Galaxy Note 2
  • Galaxy S2
  • Galaxy S2 Epic 4G Touch
  • Galaxy S2 Skyrocket
  • Galaxy S3
  • Galaxy Tab 2 10.1
  • Stratosphere

Accused Apple Devices

Samsung countered by arguing that Apple’s devices infringed its patents:

  • iPhone 4
  • iPhone 4S
  • iPhone 5
  • iPod Touch (fifth generation)
  • iPod Touch (fourth generation)## FAQs

  1. What patents are at issue in the latest Apple v. Samsung case?

    • Apple: US patents 5,946,647; 6,847,959; 7,761,414; 8,046,721; and 8,074,172
    • Samsung: US patents 6,226,449 and 5,579,239

  2. What devices are alleged to infringe these patents?

    • Apple: Samsung Admire, Galaxy Nexus, Galaxy Note, Galaxy Note 2, Galaxy S2, Galaxy S2 Epic 4G Touch, Galaxy S2 Skyrocket, Galaxy S3, Galaxy Tab 2 10.1, and Stratosphere
    • Samsung: iPhone 4, iPhone 4S, iPhone 5, iPod Touch (5th generation), and iPod Touch (4th generation)

  3. How much money is Apple seeking in damages?

    • $2.191 billion

  4. How much money is Samsung seeking in damages?

    • $6.2 million

  5. What is the main argument of Apple’s case?

    • Samsung’s devices infringe on Apple’s patented software features that make their devices more user-friendly.

  6. What is the main argument of Samsung’s case?

    • Samsung did not infringe on Apple’s patents, and many of the features that Apple claims as exclusive were actually developed by Google for Android.

  7. What is the significance of this case?

    • It has major implications for the future of the smartphone and tablet markets.

  8. See more : Super Bowl 2022 Twitter: Best 15 accounts to follow for the big game

    What is the expected outcome of the case?

    • The jury is still deliberating.

  9. What are the potential implications of the case?

    • It could set a precedent for future patent disputes between technology companies.

  10. How long has the case been going on?

    • Almost two years

  11. Who are the main players involved in the case?

    • Apple: Tim Cook (CEO), Phil Schiller (head of marketing), Greg Christie (engineer who invented the slide-to-unlock feature), Thomas Deniau (helped develop the quick link technology), and Justin Denison (chief strategy officer of Samsung Telecommunications America)
    • Samsung: Dale Sohn (former CEO of Samsung Telecommunications America), Todd Pendleton (Chief Marketing Officer of STA), Hiroshi Lockheimer (Google vice president of engineering for Android), Bjorn Bringert (Google Android engineer), and Dianne Hackborn (Google Android engineer)

  12. What are the key points of contention in the case?

    • The validity of Apple’s patents
    • Whether Samsung infringed on Apple’s patents
    • The amount of damages that Apple is entitled to

Summary

The ongoing Apple v. Samsung patent dispute is a complex and highly publicized case that has major implications for the future of the smartphone and tablet markets. The two companies have been embroiled in legal battles for years, and this latest case centers on whether Samsung infringed on Apple’s patented software features.

Apple claims that Samsung’s devices infringe on five of its patents, including those related to quick links, universal search, background syncing, slide-to-unlock, and automatic word correction. Samsung, on the other hand, argues that it did not infringe on Apple’s patents and that many of the features in question were actually developed by Google for Android.

The case has been going on for almost two years and has already resulted in a multi-billion dollar verdict against Samsung. The jury is still deliberating, but the outcome of the case could set a precedent for future patent disputes between technology companies.

In addition to the financial implications, the case also has major strategic implications for both Apple and Samsung. If Apple wins, it could strengthen its position in the smartphone market and make it more difficult for Samsung and other competitors to compete. If Samsung wins, it could weaken Apple’s patent portfolio and make it easier for other companies to develop similar products.

The outcome of the case will also be closely watched by the technology industry as a whole. It could have a major impact on the way that software patents are valued and enforced in the future.

Call to Action:

Follow our website for updates on the latest developments in the Apple v. Samsung case. We will provide you with the latest news and analysis, as well as insights from industry experts.

Source: https://anytimesoftcare.com
Category: Laptop