The legal battle between two tech giants, prompted by alleged patent infringements, continues as Samsung seeks to challenge the recent ruling in its ongoing dispute with Apple. Samsung has moved to either have the court dismiss the verdict or retry the case, citing the $539 million awarded to Apple as excessive and lacking evidential support.

Despite the recent jury decision that Samsung must compensate Apple for patent violations related to Android phones sold in 2010 and 2011, Samsung remains steadfast in its stance. The company asserts that the awarded amount is significantly higher than what was previously determined in earlier trials, marking a setback for Samsung.

One of the key points of contention in the case revolves around the interpretation of the “article of manufacture” to which a design patent applies. While Apple argues for a broader scope, encompassing the entire smartphone, Samsung maintains that the patent infringement is limited to specific components, thereby seeking a reduction in the damages owed.

Following a Supreme Court ruling in 2016, Samsung is emboldened in its argument, aiming to safeguard fair competition and innovation in the tech industry. The complexities of design and utility patents further fuel the legal debate between the two tech behemoths.

In a bid to address these challenges, Samsung has taken proactive steps to voice its concerns and explore all available avenues to seek a resolution that aligns with its vision of fostering creativity and competition. As the legal saga unfolds, both Apple and Samsung are carefully navigating the intricacies of patent law and business ethics.


  1. What is the ongoing legal dispute between Samsung and Apple about?

    • The dispute centers on alleged patent infringements related to smartphones.
  2. Why is Samsung challenging the recent court ruling?

    • Samsung believes the damages awarded to Apple are excessive and not supported by sufficient evidence.
  3. What is the significance of the “article of manufacture” in this case?

    • The interpretation of this term plays a crucial role in determining the extent of patent infringement and subsequent damages.
  4. How does Apple define the “article of manufacture” in its argument?

    • Apple contends that the design patent applies to the entire smartphone device.
  5. What is Samsung’s perspective regarding the “article of manufacture”?

    • Samsung argues that the patent infringement should be limited to specific components, advocating for a narrower scope.
  6. What steps has Samsung taken to address the legal challenges it faces?

    • Samsung has filed a motion to either dismiss the verdict or retry the case, expressing concerns over the awarded damages.
  7. How does the recent ruling impact Samsung’s position in the market?

    • The increased damages pose a significant setback for Samsung, highlighting the importance of fair competition and innovation.
  8. What role did previous court decisions play in shaping the current legal landscape between Apple and Samsung?

    • Earlier trials and Supreme Court rulings have influenced the arguments presented by both parties in the ongoing dispute.
  9. What are the potential implications of the legal battle between Apple and Samsung for the tech industry?

    • The outcome of this case could set precedents for patent law and intellectual property rights in the tech sector.
  10. How are consumers likely to be affected by the ongoing legal feud between these tech giants?

    • Consumers may witness changes in product innovation and competition as a result of the legal proceedings.
  11. What strategies can companies employ to navigate patent disputes and protect their intellectual property?

    • Seeking legal counsel, conducting thorough patent research, and exploring alternative dispute resolution mechanisms are essential strategies.
  12. What are the long-term implications of the Apple v. Samsung case for the tech industry as a whole?

    • The case underscores the importance of intellectual property protection and fair competition in driving innovation and progress in the tech sector.


The legal battle between Samsung and Apple over alleged patent infringements continues to unfold, with Samsung challenging the recent court ruling citing excessive damages. The interpretation of the “article of manufacture” remains a pivotal point of contention, shaping the trajectory of the case. As both companies navigate the complexities of patent law and competition, the outcome of this dispute holds broader implications for the tech industry. It underscores the need for clarity in intellectual property rights and fair competition practices. As readers delve into the intricacies of this legal saga, a call to action emerges for companies to uphold ethical business practices and innovation in a competitive marketplace.