A federal judge in California has recently made a decision on a class action lawsuit against a well-known tech company regarding the quality of the keyboards in their MacBook laptops. The judge denied the company’s request to dismiss the lawsuit, citing concerns raised by customers over the effectiveness of the “butterfly” keyboard design.

Here is a summary of the key points from the case:


  1. What was the reason behind the class action lawsuit against the tech company?
    Customers filed a lawsuit claiming that the “butterfly” keyboard on MacBook laptops had issues that were not adequately addressed by the company.

  2. Why did the judge reject the company’s request to dismiss the lawsuit?
    The judge allowed the lawsuit to proceed as there were indications that the company’s attempted fixes and repair programs for the keyboards may not have been effective.

  3. What are some common problems experienced by customers with the butterfly keyboards?
    Customers reported issues such as keys collecting dust, failing to register presses, or registering too many presses.

  4. When were the butterfly keyboards introduced by the tech company?
    The butterfly keyboards were introduced in 2015 as part of the company’s newest laptops.

  5. What actions did the tech company take in response to the keyboard issues?
    The company initiated a replacement program in 2018 and made attempts to address the problems with the keyboards.

  6. When was the lawsuit filed against the tech company?
    The lawsuit was filed in May 2018, shortly after the company announced the repair program.

  7. What design did the company revert to in its latest laptops?
    The company went back to using the standard “scissor” design in its newest laptops, which received positive feedback from reviewers.

  8. Why did the tech company try to have the lawsuit dismissed?
    The company argued that the customers involved in the lawsuit did not participate in the repair programs, making it difficult to prove the extent of the company’s efforts to address the keyboard issues.

  9. What was the judge’s stance on the lawsuit moving forward?
    The judge allowed the lawsuit to proceed, stating that the plaintiffs had sufficiently demonstrated that the repair program may have been ineffective in addressing the keyboard design flaws.

  10. What was the lawyer representing the customers’ response to the judge’s decision?
    The lawyer expressed satisfaction with the court’s decision to allow the lawsuit to continue.

  11. What was the company’s reaction to the court’s decision?
    The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment following the court’s decision.

  12. What is the current status of the lawsuit?
    The judge’s decision allows the lawsuit to move forward, indicating that there are still legal processes to be followed in the case.


The recent ruling by a federal judge in California allows a class action lawsuit against a tech company over keyboard issues to proceed. Customers raised concerns about the effectiveness of the “butterfly” keyboard design on MacBook laptops, leading to the legal action. Despite attempts by the company to address the problems with repair programs, the court found merit in the customers’ claims and allowed the lawsuit to move forward. The company’s decision to revert to a different keyboard design for its latest laptops suggests acknowledgment of the issues raised by customers. The legal proceedings indicate a potential resolution to the ongoing dispute between the tech company and dissatisfied customers.

Would you like to know more about this case? Visit our website for updates and further information.