Opening Section:

Maybe you are interested

A legal showdown is brewing in May as tech titans Apple and Samsung prepare to face off in a retrial to determine compensation for patent infringements. The latest twist in this epic court battle promises high stakes and captivating courtroom drama.

You are watching: Apple, Samsung to face off in May for damages retrial

Amidst the anticipation, AnyTimeSoftcare will delve into the intricacies of the case, providing insights and expert analysis. Join us as we unpack the legal intricacies, explore the impact on the tech industry, and uncover the strategies that each company will employ in this crucial retrial. As the courtroom doors open on May 14th, AnyTimeSoftcare will be there to guide you through every twist and turn of this high-profile legal battle.## The Ongoing Apple-Samsung Patent Dispute: A Comprehensive Overview

Apple’s Plea for Closure

In a recent hearing, a representative of Apple conveyed their desire for an end to the ongoing patent dispute with Samsung. The company expressed a yearning for resolution, seeking closure for all parties involved.

A Battle Spanning Half a Decade

The legal battle between Apple and Samsung over patent infringements has persisted for almost half a decade, with several trials already taking place. The current trial represents the third iteration in the case, following the initial trial in August 2012 and a subsequent damages retrial in November 2013.

Additional Patent Case

In addition to the current trial, Apple and Samsung are engaged in another patent case that encompasses more widely used devices, including the Galaxy S3. This ongoing case further contributes to the complexity of the patent dispute between the two tech giants.

Chronology of Patent Battles

Trial Description Date
Initial Trial First trial in the patent dispute August 2012
Damages Retrial Retrial to determine damages November 2013
Current Trial Third trial in the case Ongoing
Additional Case Separate patent case involving popular devices Ongoing

  1. What is the reason behind the upcoming retrial in Apple v. Samsung?

    • The retrial is to determine the damages owed by Samsung for infringing Apple’s design patents.

  2. See more : Forget the Galaxy Fold and Mate X, the Motorola Razr is the foldable phone to beat

    When is the retrial set to begin?

    • May 14, 2018

  3. How long is the retrial scheduled to last?

    • Five days

  4. Who is the judge overseeing the case?

    • District Court Judge Lucy Koh

  5. Why was new discovery admitted in the trial?

    • The parameters for determining damages have changed.

  6. What did Judge Koh say about allowing new information in the case?

    • She said it could make the case less vulnerable to appeal but cautioned against a “complete do-over.”

  7. What is the history behind the patent dispute between Apple and Samsung?

    • The companies have been involved in a patent dispute for over five years, with this being the third trial in the case.

  8. What are the potential implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling on the case?

    • The ruling reshaped the value of designs and the potential amount companies may owe for copying competitors’ product designs.

  9. See more : 6 ways FaceTime can make long-distance friendship a little easier in iOS 15

    Why did the appeals court send the case back to district court?

    • To determine damages based on the new Supreme Court ruling.

  10. What was Apple’s stance on the matter?

    • Apple wanted the appeals court to uphold the earlier damages ruling.

  11. What was Samsung’s stance on the matter?

    • Samsung wanted a new damages trial.

  12. What decision did Judge Koh make?

    • She ordered a new trial to be held in May.

Summary

The ongoing patent dispute between Apple and Samsung has prompted a retrial scheduled for May 2018 to determine damages owed by Samsung for infringing Apple’s design patents. The new trial will focus specifically on determining the damages based on the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on the scope of the infringing “article of manufacture.” This ruling has the potential to significantly impact the value of design patents and shape how companies calculate damages for design infringement.

The case has been overseen by District Court Judge Lucy Koh, who has emphasized her desire to bring closure to the long-running dispute. The ongoing legal battle highlights the complexities of intellectual property law and the challenges in determining fair compensation for design infringement.

Stay informed on the latest developments in this case by following relevant news sources and legal publications.

Source: https://anytimesoftcare.com
Category: Internet